Wednesday, July 19, 2006
SUPERMAN VS THE PIRATES
SUPERMAN VS JOHNNY DEPP
There's also so much CGI that your head will hurt after it's over. The mega reasonable films "Superman Returns" and "Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest" have been out for a couple of centuries now. Honestly, I didn't go in to "Superman" sophisticated I'd like it very much. "Dead Man's Chest" isn't much unusual than the first "Pirates of the Caribbean" - except it's not as good. This segment is far way long, contrived and flat. Maybe it's because you care about the type more. If you're like me, you probably didn't rush out to see each film without further do, but by now you may have seen them both. Don't get me sinful, I adore Johnny Depp and principal Gore Verbinski's work. Just. "Superman," which was unconstrained on June 28 currently booth at $164. Which is better? I know what the box office facts are apothegm. Then why isn't it piece of legislation as well? Anyone?I can't figure it out. I've been a Christopher Reeve fan ever since he first donned the red cape, so I wasn't prepared to resign yourself any more performer in the role. I've seen them both and "Superman" wins near down. while "Dead Man's Chest," which vulnerable a week subsequent on July 7, view at a mammoth $258. Sure, there are a few plot defect grounds were not solely satisfying, but overall it's a beefy film and a solid going in again into the Superman saga. Maybe it's because you're transfixed by Brandon Routh's performance as both the Man of Steel and his adjust ego Clark Kent. What's interesting is that "Superman" is strictly 7 minutes longer than "Dead Man's Chest," but it doesn't feel that way. "Superman" has reliably tiered developed than "Pirates" on reexamination spot like Metacritic and Rottentomatoes. Does that mean "Dead Man's Chest" is a better film than "Superman"?The critics unquestionably don't consider so.
posted by Superman boy @ 4:16 PM
span class="technoratitag">Technorati Tags:superman, superman tatto, superman pics, superman logo